Chafer cyberespionage group targets embassies with updated homebrew spyware: Kaspersky Lab

Chafer cyberespionage group targets embassies with updated homebrew spyware: Kaspersky Lab

190
0
SHARE
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Kaspersky Lab researchers have detected multiple attempts to infect foreign diplomatic entities in Iran with homebrew spyware. The attacks appear to be using an updated Remexi backdoor. Several legitimate tools were also used during the campaign. The Remex ibackdoor is linked to a suspected Farsi-speaking cyberespionage group known as Chafer, previously associated with the cyber-surveillance of individuals in the Middle East. The targeting of embassies could suggest a new focus for the group.

The operation highlights how threat actors in emerging regions are mounting campaigns against targets of interest using relatively basic, homebrew malware combined with publically available tools. In this instance, the attackers used an improved version of the Remexi backdoor – a tool that enables remote administration of a victim’s machine.

Remexi was first detected in 2015, being used by a cyberespionage group named Chafer for a cyber-surveillance operation targeting individuals and a number of organizations across the Middle East. The fact that the backdoor used in the new campaign has code similarities with known Remexi samples, combined with the target victim set means that Kaspersky Lab’s researchers have linked it to Chafer with medium confidence.

The newly discovered Remexi malware is able to execute commands remotely and to seize screenshots, browser data including user credentials, login data and history, and any typed text, among other things. The stolen data is exfiltrated using the legitimate Microsoft Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) application – a Windows component designed to enable background Windows updates. The trend towards combining malware with appropriated or legitimate code helps attackers both to save time and resources when creating malware and to make attribution more complicated.

“When we talk about likely state-sponsored cyberespionage campaigns, people often imagine advanced operations with complex tools developed by experts. However, the people behind this spyware campaign look more like system administrators than sophisticated threat actors: they knowhow to code, but their campaign relies moreon the creative use of tools that exist already, thanon new, advanced features or elaborate architecture of the code. However, even relatively simple tools can cause significant damage so we urge organizations to protect their valuable information and systems against all level of threats, and to use threat intelligence to understand how the landscape is evolving,” said Denis Legezo, security researcher at Kaspersky Lab.

LEAVE A REPLY